Magnify the Traditional Mixed-Signal Eyepatch Verification

Apr 20, 2021

Weeks before tapeout, SoC design teams must verify large mixed-signal transistor-level netlists. The standard approach is to verify functionality by running simulations with back-annotated gate-level RTL along with behavioral analog blocks. However, since this approach might overlook serious errors, old-fashion eyeball checking remains necessary.

This whitepaper exhibits some situations that might get overlooked by the standard approach and eyeball checking. There is also a description of the difficulties of performing mixed-signal tests that could detect these types of situations. To overcome this verification challenge, we introduce a reliable static electrical analysis tool that runs built-in assertion checks to netlists with billions of devices in a short runtime.

Other stories

Webinar – How to Reduce Thousands of False Errors in 15 Minutes

Webinar – How to Reduce Thousands of False Errors in 15 Minutes

Analyzing electrical errors across an IP or a SoC at top level, can be a painful and long process, often requiring extensive setup time and hundred of hours to distinguish real issues from false positives.  To address this challenge, Aniah developed OneCheck, a formal...

Aniah Ignites Global Expansion with Strategic Partnerships

Aniah Ignites Global Expansion with Strategic Partnerships

We are thrilled to unveil groundbreaking partnerships that will catapult Aniah's international growth to unprecedented heights! These strategic alliances mark a pivotal moment in our journey, one that will accelerate our development and reinforce our commitment to...

ERC: An exhaustive classification of false errors

ERC: An exhaustive classification of false errors

All formal verification tools, including Electrical Rules Check (ERC), must reach a trade-off between “false negatives” (i.e., real design errors that are not detected) and “false positives” (or false errors, locations where errors are erroneously reported. This...